Green Building Policy in Asia - China's Green Building Action Plan

China is paying more and more attention to green building development and in their 12th Five-Year Plan (2011-2015) –Green Building Action Plan, the main targets are as follow: 

New buildings –

1. Targeted to have one billion m² of new green buildings; By the end of 2015, 20% of buildings in new cities have to be green.

 Energy-saving renovation of existing buildings –

1. complete heat metering and energy-saving renovation in Northern region for > 400 million square meters,
2. energy-saving renovation to cover 50 million square meters of buildings in hot summer and cold winder regions,
3. Retrofit the public buildings for 120 million square meters,
4.  implement 400,000 sets of energy saving demonstration projects in rural areas.
5.  By the end of 2020, the energy-saving construction of urban residential areas in northern region is basically completed.

For the whole action plan (in Chinese), please visit the following website: http://big5.gov.cn/gate/big5/www.gov.cn/zwgk/2013-01/06/content_2305793.htm

"Smart Energy Panel" Seminar by London Business School Energy Club

Attended the captioned seminar this Tuesday and was almost the best seminar (as it is my interested topics) after I arrived in London. And from one of the speakers, I realized that it is planned that the building owners cannot lease or sell their properties if they got F or G rating in 2018 (admit that I know little about EU policies =.=). However, when I searched for more information about the policy, actually I was quite disappointed that the rating is referring to EPC (design rating) instead of DEC (operational rating)!!

I understand that there are much to be improved for DEC, for example

1. building categorization
2. inaccuracy of the result
3. cannot access the performance of individual systems

But at the end of the day, operating rating is more meaningful than design rating in my opinion (you can refer to the CarbonBuzz project that I introduced in my previous post)!!

Anyway, hope that the Government can pay more attention to the operating rating in the future......

Difference when learning energy in East and West

Probably the heading is little bit misleading and not always true, but I would like to discuss briefly here the difference between learning in East (hot climate) and West (cold climate), especially for commercial buildings.

Before starting the discussion, probably we should look at the energy / electricity consumption of a typical commercial building in HK (hot) and UK (cold) first.

Fig. 1 Average energy use in UK office (source from CarbonTrust) 

Fig. 2 Commercial Energy End-uses in HK commercial buildings in 2011 (source: EMSD, HKSAR Government)

You can note that space heating and air condition accounts for a large portion of the energy end-uses consumption. Therefore, energy consumption by air conditioning is a big topic when studying building energy (esp lighting is already quite efficient nowadays, many new commercial buildings started to install T5 light tubes or even LED)

So what is the difference? I will show you 2 examples.

Building Facade 
Studies showed that curtain walls would bring energy savings to cold climate countries due to bring heat and light to the building but cause the buildings in warm countries to consume more energy (the benefit of having daylight into the building is not enough to cover the energy used for air conditioning load).

Fig. 3 a curtain wall building in Frankfurt

Occupant Behaviour 
The unit Clo means the thermal insulation provided by clothing. The higher the Clo it is, the warmer you will be. In warm countries, you may need to wear low Clo clothes, but vice versa in cold countries.

Fig. 4 a fashion design (for office wear) award show organized by HKGBC and Clo is one of the judging criteria, so the designers need to design clothes with low Clo

Hong Kong Energy End-use Data 2013 - Energy consumption by buildings keep rising!!!

In September of every year, the Electrical and Mechanical Services Department (EMSD) would publish a report on the Hong Kong Energy End-use and it shows the city's energy consumption of 2 years ago (i.e. for the 2013 report, it kept the 2011 energy consumption record).

It is interesting to see that the portion of electricity consumption by buildings kept rising (92% of the citywide electricity consumption!!!) and let's do a quick overview of the statistics of this year. =)

(source: EMSD - HKSAR Government)

• The energy consumption of the whole city kept rising for 4 consecutive years and it is highest among these 10 years (278 618 TJ)
• Buildings consume for 92% of the total electricity used, while it is only 86% in 2001. 
• Even for the total energy use (including other use of fossil fuels), buildings in HK consumes 63% of the total energy use, while it is 54% in 2001. 

As Hong Kong is a city without much industrial activities, it is easy to understand that why buildings take such a large portion of energy in the city. But it is unforgivable that the energy consumption kept rising, while every city worldwide is emphasizing "sustainable development". 

Though you may argue that the Building Energy Efficiency Ordinance (BEEO) is just being enforced from 21 September 2012 and BEAM Plus (the building environment assessment system, just like LEED) is getting more popular over the years, the energy consumption will drop starting from 2012 or 2013. However, as BEEO only asks owners to provide their energy data but not setting a target for them and it is only the BEAM Plus for new buildings getting popular due to the GFA concession policy, I really doubted that whether the dream of having the energy consumption dropping will happen shortly. 

Probably, the HK Government should follow 

• Singapore - to set up a sustainable blueprint and strict targets of energy reduction
• Japan - to implement a comprehensive system, the Cap-and-Trade policy, for the buildings. 

For the whole report, please visit the following website: http://www.emsd.gov.hk/emsd/e_download/pee/HKEEUD2013.pdf

(too busy at the moment, probably will do a more detail introduction for worldwide policies and analysis in the future =) ) 

10 reasons for why I study Energy Demand

1. Energy is a trendy stuff
2. I don't like chemistry (hard for me to study topics about energy supply). 
3. Building consumes over 90% of electricity in my city
4. I can probably get a good job in related area
5. I studied engineering for my undergraduate
6. If other uses less, I can use more 
7. I like working in front of the computer and doing data analysis stuff
8. The word "sustainability" sounds cool
9. I like this subject
10. I really like this subject. 

Something about me - Robot to Environment

(Source: South China Morning Post - Left; Singtao Daily - Right)

An old news clipping (Singtao Daily - 11/7/2008) - http://std.stheadline.com/archive/fullstory.asp?andor=or&year1=2008&month1=07&day1=11&year2=2008&month2=07&day2=11&category=all&id=20080711m01&keyword1=&keyword2=

Building Energy Benchmarking 101 - What is Energy Benchmarking?

What is Energy Benchmarking 

 It is to compare the Energy Use Index, i.e. energy used per floor area, of different buildings fairly by

• Categorization   – Grouping the similar types of buildings together
• Normalization   – minimize the objective impacts(weather,   occupancy) on the building’s energy use
• Separation     – excluding the special energy use in the buildings   (e.g. sever rooms)

What information it provides

Benchmarking systems usually tell you what your building's energy performance is, and probably some additional information as well. Take Display Energy Certificate (DEC) (UK) as an example: 

(picture source: https://www.gov.uk/)